Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 141
Filter
1.
Issues Ment Health Nurs ; 44(6): 562-570, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242557

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the lives of college students. The psychological distress from the pandemic increased risk for provisional rates of Major Depression Disorder (MDD) during an already crucial developmental period. Using an online survey, participants were assessed for a provisional diagnosis of MDD using a validated screening tool, along with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and psychosocial correlates. Findings showed a significant increase in the prevalence of MDD, and significant differences in social support, loneliness, substance use, GAD and suicidality were identified. Early screening and detection for potential MDD symptoms can reduce the severity, duration, and reoccurrence of future MDD episodes for college students.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Students/psychology
2.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr ; 51(2): 65-75, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326822

ABSTRACT

The early psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown is greater in people with mental disorders. This study explored the differences in the psychological impact on people with an anxiety disorder by sex in Spain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Male , Pandemics , Sex Characteristics , Anxiety/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Communicable Disease Control , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Depression
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 294, 2023 04 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of mental health status between self-poisoning suicide patients and their family members, and it also sought to identify potential patient's risk and parental factors for the prediction of suicide attempt, anxiety, and depression. METHODS: In this study, 151 poisoned patients were prospectively included, and they were matched 1:1 with 151 family members. We gathered information on patient's and their matched family member's demographics, lifestyle choices, mental health status, level of intimacy, and history of psychiatry disease. The relationship of patient's and their family member's mental health state was investigated using a correlation matrix. Multivariable analyses (multiple logistic regression) were conducted among patients and their matched family members, to identify potential risk factors for self-poisoning suicide, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 67.55% (102/151) attempted self-poisoning suicide. Poisoned patients had more severe anxiety and depression symptoms than their matched family members, and this difference was even more pronounced among patients with self-poisoning suicide. Generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) score for family members was significantly and favorably correlated with patient's GAD-7 score after eliminating non-suicide patients and their matched family members. The patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score showed a similar pattern, and the family member's PHQ-9 score was strongly and favorably associated with patient's PHQ-9 and Beck hopelessness scale-20 (BHS-20) score. Multivariable analysis showed that married marital status (P = 0.038), quitting smoking (P = 0.003), sedentary time of 1 to 6 h (P = 0.013), and participation in a sports more than five times per week (P = 0.046) were all significantly associated with a lower risk of suicide by self-poisoning, while a more serious anxiety state (P = 0.001) was significantly associated with a higher risk of self-poisoning suicide. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that, specifically among self-poisoning suicide patients, married marital status (P = 0.011) and no history of psychiatry disease (P < 0.001) were protective factors for anxiety, while divorced or widowed marital status (P = 0.004), a sedentary time of 1 to 3 h (P = 0.022), and a higher monthly income (P = 0.027) were significant contributors to anxiety. The propensity of additional family-matched characteristics to predict patient's suicidality, anxiety, and depression was also examined. CONCLUSIONS: Self-poisoning suicide patients have severe mental health issues. Patients who self-poison have a close connection to their family member's mental health, particularly their levels of anxiety and depression. According to the findings, being married and adopting healthy lifestyle habits, such as quitting smoking and drinking, increasing their physical activity levels, and managing their idle time, are able to help patients with mental health concerns and even suicidal thoughts.


Subject(s)
Family , Suicide, Attempted , Humans , Matched-Pair Analysis , Family/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Health Status
4.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0281632, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317813

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aimed to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the appropriateness and feasibility of a midwife-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based, three-session program delivered remotely to pregnant women at risk for anxiety disorders. METHODS: The study design was a pilot RCT. Outcome was the difference between the two groups in the change in generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), Kessler6 (K6) and Edinberg Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) etc. Recruitment was conducted from August 2020 to July 2021 in clinics and web-based survey monitors in Japan, with follow-up through November 2021. RESULTS: This program involving 63 pregnant women were administered. Although the intervention was remote, a total of three sessions was completed during pregnancy. The change in GAD-7 scores from pre- to 1 month postpartum, was mean -1.77 in the intervention group and mean -0.97 in the control group, with a p-value of .521, indicating no significant difference between the two groups, although GAD-7 scores were lower in the intervention group. The change in K6 score from pre- to 1 month postpartum, was mean -3.55 in the intervention group and mean -1.62 in the control group, with a p-value of .168, indicating no significant difference between the two groups, although the intervention group showed a greater decrease. In particular, in primiparas, the change in GAD-7 scores in the intervention group was large, and some expressed a desire for a postpartum session, suggesting that a follow-up session after delivery may be effective. In multiparas, the control group showed an increase in both GAD-7 and K6 scores from late pregnancy to 1 month postpartum, while the intervention group showed a decrease in scores. CONCLUSION: The program was implemented using CBT conducted by midwife, anxiety decreased in primiparas. In future RCTs, it was suggested that additional postpartum sessions may be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical trial registry ID: UMIN000040304.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Midwifery , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Japan , Pilot Projects , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology
5.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv ; 61(5): 11-16, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314528

ABSTRACT

Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health conditions affecting pediatric populations. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, recommends objective measurement of pediatric anxiety for evaluation of symptomatology and treatment response. The objective of the current review was to summarize recommendations and resources for measuring pediatric anxiety, and to quantify and characterize use of outcome measures for generalized anxiety in pediatric psychiatry. These findings represent an essential step toward understanding how and to what extent anxiety rating scales are used in pediatric psychiatry and where quality improvement initiatives may be needed. Education, training, and further research are warranted to optimize use of measurement-based care for generalized anxiety in pediatric psychiatry settings and to determine which scales are optimal for use in this context. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 61(5), 11-16.].


Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Psychiatry , Humans , Child , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology
6.
Psychiatr Danub ; 35(1): 97-102, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pandemic caused by the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the mental health of the general population, leading to an increase in depression, anxiety and stress. The results of the studies on the psychological effects of the pandemic in patients with psychiatric illnesses were contradictory in that some reported higher adverse effects in patients with psychiatric illnesses compared to the healthy control subjects, whereas some did not. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare the patients with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder and the healthy control subjects in terms of certain psychological parameters during the pandemic period. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 81 patients, who were diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and 80 healthy volunteers of matching characteristics were included in this study. Both the patient and control groups were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, short form of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). The resulting research data were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 software. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of depression, stress, intrusion, hyperarousal and avoidance. On the other hand, the increase observed in the anxiety symptoms was found to be significant in the patient group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study revealed that the depression, stress and trauma-related stress responses of GAD patients have not differred during the COVID-19 pandemic period, whereas that their anxiety levels have increased significantly, as compared to the healthy control subjects. In this context, it is recommended that the clinicians take into consideration that the pandemic may lead to an increase in the symptoms of individuals diagnosed with anxiety disorder.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Depression/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology
7.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243704, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264889

ABSTRACT

The global epidemic of (mis)information, spreading rapidly via social media platforms and other outlets, can be a risk factor for the development of anxiety disorders among vulnerable individuals. Cyberchondria can be a vulnerability factor for developing anxiety in a pandemic situation, particularly when the Internet is flooded with (mis)information. The aim of our study was to examine how cyberchondria is related to changes in levels of COVID-19 concern and safety behaviours among persons living in Croatia during the period in which the first COVID-19 case was identified and when the country recorded its first fatality. Repeated cross-sectional data collection was conducted during two waves over a period of three weeks (N1 = 888; N2 = 966). The first began on the day of the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in Croatia (February 24th, 2020) and the second wave began three weeks later, on the day the first COVID-19 fatality was recorded in Croatia (March 19th, 2020). Participants completed an online questionnaire regarding various COVID-19 concerns and safety behaviours aimed at disease prevention (information seeking, avoidance and hygiene) and a measure of cyberchondria (Short Cyberchondria Scale, SCS). We analysed whether changes to the epidemiological situation during the period between the two waves of data collection led to an increase in COVID-19 related behaviour directly and indirectly via an increase in COVID-19 concerns. The results indicated that, between the two waves of research, there was a pronounced increase in concerns regarding COVID-19 (b = 1.11, p < .001) as well as significant behavioural changes (b = 1.18-2.34, p < .001). Also, results demonstrated that cyberchondria plays a moderating role in these changes. In the first wave, persons with severe cyberchondria were already intensely concerned with safety behaviours. High cyberchondria and high levels of concern about the COVID-19 are associated with intense avoidance behaviours, R2 = .63, p < .001. A moderated partial mediation model was confirmed, in which the effect of the epidemiological situation was weaker for those with higher results on the SCS (as indicated by index of moderated mediation between -.10 and -.15, p < .05). As such, cyberchondria is a contributing factor to long-term anxiety and its impact during pandemic on the general mental health burden should therefore be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , COVID-19 , Hypochondriasis , Information Seeking Behavior , Internet , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Media , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Croatia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hypochondriasis/epidemiology , Hypochondriasis/psychology , Male , Middle Aged
8.
Psychiatry Res ; 323: 115169, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266884

ABSTRACT

Prenatal generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common and underdiagnosed condition with negative health consequences to both the pregnant individual and child. Here we studied the relationship between diagnosis and treatment status of GAD during pregnancy (no GAD diagnosis, suspected but not diagnosed, diagnosed but not treated, diagnosed and treated) during the COVID-19 pandemic and postpartum mental health outcomes, while considering the potential influence of individual psychological factors such as distress tolerance and resilience and the role of COVID-19-related health worries. In this sample of predominantly highly educated and white birthing individuals, one in five respondents experienced GAD during pregnancy and another one in six suspected GAD but was not diagnosed. Amongst those with a GAD diagnosis, 30% did not receive treatment. We found that those with a GAD diagnosis during pregnancy who did not receive treatment showed the highest levels of postpartum anxiety and depressive symptoms in the postpartum, even after controlling for covariates, and experienced the most COVID-19-related health worries. In comparison, individuals with a GAD diagnosis during pregnancy who received treatment experienced significantly lower anxiety symptom burden and depressive symptom burden, with a symptom burden similar to those without a confirmed or suspected diagnosis after controlling for individual psychological factors. We conclude that clinicians should strongly consider screening for and treating prenatal anxiety to prevent suboptimal postpartum mental health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Pregnancy , Child , Humans , Pandemics , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Postpartum Period , Depression/psychology
9.
R I Med J (2013) ; 106(3): 11-16, 2023 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between loss of a loved one to COVID-19 and depression, anxiety and suicide ideation among Rhode Island young adults. METHODS: The 2022 Rhode Island Young Adult Survey recruited 1,022 young adults aged 18-25 years who lived in Rhode Island. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of depression, anxiety, and suicide ideation due to experiencing a loss due to COVID-19. RESULTS: The odds of anxiety and suicide ideation were 57% (OR[95% CI] = 1.57 [1.13, 2.18]) and 79% (OR[95% CI] = 1.79 [1.19, 2.70]) greater among participants who lost a close friend or family member due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Losing a loved one to COVID-19 increases the risk of anxiety or suicide ideation among young adults in RI. Prevention measures such as screening for mental health symptoms and incorporating mental health awareness into college, university and workplace settings should be instituted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Young Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Anxiety Disorders/psychology
10.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 62(7): 707-709, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282697

ABSTRACT

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly impacted pediatric mental health, the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on youth with anxiety disorders has not been prospectively examined. Further, there are limited prospective data on post-acute sequelae COVID-19, including symptoms that constitute the long COVID neuropsychiatric syndrome. In December 2019, we began a longitudinal study of adolescents aged 12-17 years with DSM-5 primary anxiety disorders treated with either duloxetine or escitalopram. Assessments included all items from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) scales at each week and a weekly clinician-rated Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale. We examined the longitudinal course of anxiety, including following laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in affected adolescents. This prospective study of the longitudinal impact of COVID-19 in pediatric anxiety disorders reveals that COVID-19 is associated with worsening anxiety symptoms and a disquieting 33% worsening in syndromic severity. Further, these data raise the possibility that, in anxious youth, COVID-19 is associated with a surfeit of neuropsychiatric symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Longitudinal Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology
11.
Prim Care ; 50(1): 119-125, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274008

ABSTRACT

Mental health is a very important component of whole health because the body, mind, and spirit are woven together to create the fabric of a person's life. Many people in the United States and globally are living with mental health challenges, and it seems that much more attention has been given to anxiety-related mental health conditions in the past few years due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The pandemic may certainly have accelerated the onset of mental health conditions for some who were already predisposed, whether it be to depression, anxiety, psychosis, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, to name a few.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety , Primary Health Care
12.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 25(2): 31-43, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270195

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature on racism and anxiety-related disorders, especially social anxiety, specific phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder, is notably lacking. This report aims to review recent evidence demonstrating the link between racial discrimination and various anxiety-related disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Anxiety-related disorders were the most significant mediator for daily discrimination and suicidal thoughts, above both depression and substance use. Further, studies showed that racial discrimination promotes posttraumatic stress and racial trauma among people of color. Systemic racism puts people of color at a higher risk for anxiety disorders than White people. Clinical case examples provide lived evidence of diverse racial and ethnic individuals suffering from anxiety-related disorders, with the development and worsening of symptoms due to racism and microaggressions. There is a prominent need for recent research on anxiety-related disorders and racism. Recommendations for clinicians and future research directions are provided. These actions are required to address bias and mental health inequities and empower people of color.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Racism , Humans , Anxiety/ethnology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/ethnology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Racism/psychology
13.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry ; 79: 101840, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Looming cognitive style (LCS) and intolerance of uncertainty (IUC) are both cognitive risk factors that play an important role in development of anxiety disorders. Even though both are known to be triggered by ambiguous situations, there is inadequate research on how they predict anxiety and repetitive negative thinking (RNT) patterns in response to ambiguity. The current study aimed to examine the interactive association of IUC and LCS with state anxiety and intensity of RNT following exposure to a stressor that involves ambiguity. METHODS: Data were collected from 292 (153 women) individuals aged between 18 and 63 (M = 20.82, SD = 5.20) who were administered self-report measures of LCS, IUC, and anxiety followed by a vignette describing an ambiguous situation. State RNT and anxiety were assessed following exposure to the vignette. RESULTS: The results indicated that IUC moderated the association of physical looming with state RNT. Individuals who have elevated levels of both physical looming and IUC reported experiencing more higher frequency of RNT when compared with other individuals. LIMITATIONS: Although the manipulation check has shown that the scenario is effective it was not pilot tested. Also, since the manipulation was conducted online, the manipulation may not have been presented in a standardized way to all the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the study shows that the two risk factors enhance each other's effect and lead to more intense levels of repetitive, uncontrollable, and distressing thoughts following exposure to ambiguity.


Subject(s)
Pessimism , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Pessimism/psychology , Uncertainty , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Cognition
14.
J Affect Disord ; 327: 378-384, 2023 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In June 2021, the COVID-19 spread again in the community, and residents had to face the impact of the outbreak again after 276 days, none of the local cases in Guangdong Province, China. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and anxiety in college students in non-epidemic area during the periods of re-emergence of COVID-19. METHODS: A survey was conducted among 86,767 college students in Guangdong Province, China from 10 to 18 June 2021, information on the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and Family APGAR Index were collected. Five moderation and mediation models were analyzed using latent moderated structural equations. RESULTS: The results showed that IU was positively related to anxiety (r = 0.42, p < 0.000). After controlling for age and gender, latent moderated structural equations indicated that catastrophizing mediated the relationship between IU and anxiety, and family function acted as a moderator in this relationship. Further analyses indicated that IU directly affected anxiety and had indirect effects on anxiety by catastrophizing. This relationship was weaker among college students who reported lower family function. CONCLUSION: This study provides practical implications for designing intervention strategies to reduce anxiety in college students when the epidemic re-emerges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emotional Regulation , Humans , Uncertainty , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Students/psychology , Cognition
15.
J Med Virol ; 95(2): e28556, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236340

ABSTRACT

Since the start of the pandemic, there has been an increase in the incidence of psychiatric morbidity among those infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and those indirectly affected by COVID-19. There has been a considerable increase in the number of individuals with such psychiatric conditions as depression, acute stress disorders, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). About one-third of patients with COVID-19 are reported to have developed short and long-term neuropsychiatric conditions such as delirium, agitation, altered consciousness, hypoxic encephalopathy encephalitis, dysexecutive syndrome, cerebrovascular complications (e.g., stroke), hypoxic encephalopathy, convulsions, neuromuscular dysfunction, demyelinating processes, or parkinsonism through several pathophysiological mechanisms. Nevertheless, as the pandemic progressed, data on neuropsychiatric manifestations implied that the pathologic capacity of COVID-19 and its association with the onset and/or exacerbation of psychiatric morbidity indicate that COVID-19 is potentially related to neuropsychiatric involvement. Patients with existing mental disorders under psychotropic treatment exposed to the COVID-19 infection have been represented by an increased risk of worsened psychiatric symptoms and expanded drug side effects. The present study aimed to describe five pediatric patients with various psychiatric illness that experienced COVID-19 infection and had potentially associated neuropsychiatric involvement, such as exacerbation of underlying psychiatric symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe adolescents with COVID-19 infection that presented with a series of manifestations in the form of an increase in extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)  during exacerbation of underlying psychiatric disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypoxia, Brain , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Adolescent Psychiatry , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology
16.
Psychiatry Res ; 320: 115044, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165774

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To examine whether the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a change in demand for psychiatric treatment, interest in internet-based therapy, and differences in treatment requests by self-reported diagnoses (e.g., Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Social Anxiety Disorder). METHODS: Using an interrupted time series design, we analyzed intake questionnaires of treatment-seeking patients (N = 1,954) at an anxiety treatment center between June 6, 2019 through September 13, 2021. RESULTS: The change in general treatment-seeking from before to immediately after the global pandemic declaration was not statistically significant. However, there was a steady increase in treatment seeking, with a more pronounced increase from 2020 into 2021. Interest in internet-based therapy increased significantly after the onset of COVID-19. The number of treatment-seeking individuals who self-reported "concerns or diagnoses" of PTSD increased significantly. CONCLUSION: The study supports anecdotal reports from clinics across the country about unprecedented demand for services. It highlights that many patients experienced an immediate impact of the pandemic on their self-reported concerns about trauma and PTSD symptoms, which has important clinical implications. It also highlights a shifting openness to internet-based services during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety/therapy
17.
Brain Behav ; 12(11): e2757, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2118861

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate how gelotophobia correlates with trait anxiety in a sample of Brazilian college students. METHODS: We evaluated the association of GELOPH < 15 > scores with both self-reported experiences of bullying victimization and trait anxiety measures assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The study consisted of a sample of 65 adult volunteers (M = 21.48, SD = 2.54 years, 38 females), recruited through social media or flyer distribution, and submitted to online versions of the gelotophobia assessment instrument (GELOPH < 15 >) and the STAI. RESULTS: Most participants (N = 56, 86.15%) had an STAI-T score indicative of high trait anxiety. The average GELOPH < 15 > score of the sample was 2.69 (0.65) and 39 of the subjects (60%) were considered gelotophobes. There was a strong positive correlation between the GELOPH < 15 > and STAI-T scores but no correlation between bullying and either the STAI-T and GELOPH < 15 > scores. However, the great majority of subjects with gelotophobia reported been previously bullied. CONCLUSION: In our sample, all gelotophobes had trait anxiety, but only a fraction of anxious subjects had gelotophobia. These preliminary findings expand on previous reports underscoring the high prevalence of mental health problems afflicting higher education students in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Fear , Adult , Female , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Fear/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Personality Inventory
18.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 464-473, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054022

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate stress levels among the health care workers (HCWs) of the radiation oncology community in Asian countries. METHODS: HCWs of the radiation oncology departments from 29 tertiary cancer care centers of Bangladesh, India, Indonesia and Nepal were studied from May 2020 to July 2020. A total of 758 eligible HCWs were identified. The 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, and 22-Item Impact of Events Scale-Revised were used for assessing anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to identify the causative factors affecting mental health. RESULTS: A total of 758 participants from 794 HCWs were analyzed. The median age was 31 years (IQR, 27-28). The incidence of moderate to severe levels of anxiety, depression, and stress was 34.8%, 31.2%, and 18.2%, respectively. Severe personal concerns were noticed by 60.9% of the staff. On multivariate analysis, the presence of commonly reported symptoms of COVID-19 during the previous 2 weeks, contact history (harzard ratio [HR], 2.04; CI, 1.15 to 3.63), and compliance with precautionary measures (HR, 1.69; CI, 1.19 to 2.45) for COVID-19 significantly predicted for increasing anxiety (HR, 2.67; CI, 1.93 to 3.70), depression (HR, 3.38; CI 2.36 to 4.84), and stress (HR, 2.89; CI, 1.88 to 4.43) (P < .001). A significant regional variation was also noticed for anxiety, stress, and personal concerns. CONCLUSION: This survey conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that a significant proportion of HCWs in the radiation oncology community experiences moderate to severe levels of anxiety, depression, and stress. This trend is alarming and it is important to identify and intervene at the right time to improve the mental health of HCWs to avoid any long-term impacts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/prevention & control , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/prevention & control , Depression/psychology , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , India/epidemiology , Indonesia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Pandemics , Radiation Oncology/methods , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology
19.
Psychol Rep ; 125(6): 3069-3083, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2038474

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 survivors suffer from severe psychosocial challenges related to the current pandemic. In this context, it was aimed to evaluate the coronavirus anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and also determine the quality of life (QOL), and coping styles with stress in survivors by comparing them with non-COVID controls (NCs). This study was conducted from April 15 to October 15, 2021, as a cross-sectional study design. The study included 339 survivors who were confirmed with COVID-19 through clinical tests in the last 3 months and 321 NCs who had not been infected with COVID-19. Besides sociodemographic and clinical data, a set of valid and reliable assessment tools were used to measure outcomes of coronavirus anxiety, coping styles, post-traumatic stress, generalized anxiety, and quality of life. The total scores of IES-R, GAD-7, and CAS were significantly higher in survivors than in the NCs. These results revealed that survivors manifested higher levels of coronavirus anxiety, generalized anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms (p < 0.05). In survivors,  the rates of GAD and coronavirus anxiety were found to be 59.3% and 25.7%, respectively. Additionally, the majority of survivors (89.4%) reported the severity of anxiety as moderate to severe, and also almost two-thirds of them reported the psychological impact of the pandemic as moderate to severe. Furthermore, survivors were found to have a lower quality of life. The findings of this study indicate that survivors experienced higher levels of coronavirus anxiety, generalized anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, and had lower QOL. In addition, it was determined that survivors haven't been using active styles adequately in coping with stress. Thus, psychological intervention studies should be conducted and public mental health strategies should be developed. Providing psychosocial support and psychological guidance will contribute to mental health well-being, and improve the QOL and coping strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Humans , Quality of Life , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Survivors/psychology
20.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 14898, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2016841

ABSTRACT

Job loss is a stressful event that increases the risk of experiencing depression and anxiety, especially during the initial months of unemployment. This study examined differences in psychological symptoms and resilient functioning accounted by employment status. The results pointed out that recently unemployed compared to currently employed individuals had lower levels of perceived controllability and resilience as well as higher levels of depression and anxiety. Path analyses showed that lower controllability appraisals at wave 1 of recently unemployed compared to employed individuals, in turn, predicted a lower use of active coping and reappraisal at wave 2, with the latter further accounting for lower levels in resilience. Higher use of distraction further mediated the relation between employment status and higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. Our findings demonstrate the importance of controllability appraisals and coping strategies used to promote adaptive psychological functioning following job loss.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Employment/psychology , Humans , Unemployment/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL